This text is also available in: esEspañol

Image_Copied_on_2017-02-20_at_11_23_AM.jpg

This is the only picture that I have of Dan and I together.  There must be better pictures out there!

I first met Dan “virtually” on Aikiweb. Initially I read some of the exchanges there which had the potential to be enlightening, but were so filled with acrimony that I tended to simply avoid them leaning more towards the writings of Ellis Amdur and Professor Peter Goldsbury. Nevertheless, when I did take a peek I began to notice that the things that Dan was talking about, were things that I recognized. This happened often enough that I had the strong suspicion that Dan’s background relating to the topics discussed was almost definitely Daito Ryu. What he talked about and how he talked about were simply to “close to home” to be a fluke. On top of this, when questioned about his background in that area Dan declined to reply. Considering all of the evidence at hand, I assumed that Dan was likely honor bound (either personally or organizationally . . . but it all comes back to the person doesn’t it!) not to say certain things . . . even unto to his own detriment. With this in mind, it seemed to me that here was a man that tried very hard to do the honorable thing even at a personal loss. Holding the same values, I couldn’t help but to admire that.

In the mean time, in the “early days,” it seems that most individuals were not coming to the same conclusions that I was. This, however, did not surprise me in the least. How could they? The majority of Aikidoshi, and even Daito Ryu practitioners for that matter, were completely unaware of most of what he was talking about. They had no frame of reference for comparison. It was as if Dan was speaking about infrared before it was commonly known. To some his words about an invisible something that could do great things sounded like horse pucky. While others, responded with something like, “Red? Oh yeah, we use red all the time!” Or, “Who do you think you are coming on here and simply assuming we don’t know about red!” And finally, others were simply incredulous of Dan’s claims. “I know red. I’ve used red all my life and, yeah, you can make signs with red but you can’t “send signals through space” or “heat things up” with it! It “looks” hot but it isn’t. We all know that. To create heat you need friction!” Some even posted videos of themselves using red. And others complained that Dan’s references to red were far too limited pointing out that red was related to emotions, and nature, sunsets, etc. A scholar delved into the etymology of “red” and how that might be pertinent to understanding red. And one individual flat out proclaimed that Dan had no real idea what he was talking about. He said infrared had nothing to do with it, and if Dan really knew what he was talking about he could, and would, talk about a full banana. But Dan doesn’t talk about full bananas!  Therefore Dan obviously doesn’t know what he isn’t talking about.” This same individual declined to talk about full bananas himself explaining that he feared that Dan would then steal the whole bunch and claim that they were his! Such were the times.

Despite that, I became increasingly interested in what Dan was saying. He was just about the only other guy I knew of that was talking about stuff I had been introduced to, and in the manner I had been taught. I even jumped in with a comment or two now and then and Dan responded quite civilly and knowledgeably.

As a matter of fact, when Howard Popkin first came to teach Daito Ryu at George Ledyard’s dojo, Aikido Eastside (Great guys there BTW which reflects well on George!), George put Howard up in his guest bedroom and allowed me to crash on his (incredibly comfortable) couch. We three were hanging out (probably drinking) late at night and the subject of Dan Harden came up. George asked Howie what he made out of Dan, and Howie said he didn’t know. (After meeting Dan he said that he was probably the most formidable martial artist he had ever met in his life, or words to that effect!) I pitched in and said, “I was taught that there is Jujutsu, Aiki Jujutsu and Aiki no Jutsu. I’m guessing that Dan is teaching Aiki no Jutsu.” (Later Howie called me from New York and told me he “owed me a dalla” for that one!)

In time I figured a couple of things out. First, Dan is an honest guy. Now, what he was honestly saying rubbed some folks the wrong way. Maybe it was how he said it. But I could be sympathetic with that because I have been known to deliver the right message the wrong way on more than one occasion. (Color me sincerely well intentioned but socially inept at times.) On the other hand, I suspect that the truth that he pointed out was just too disagreeable for some to even consider . . . but that didn’t mean that it wasn’t true.

“That’s not Aikido!” ~ Ueshiba Morihei

Dan’s honesty mattered to me because he described what he could do with what I had learned. And what he described was well beyond what I could do with what I had learned . . . and that was important. Just based on dates, I should have been farther along the “Aiki ability” spectrum than Dan, and it sounded like I wasn’t. That sucks and all, but if the shoe fits . . . This indicated that I had likely screwed up somewhere along the line. I hadn’t been taught wrong, or incompletely, other wise I couldn’t have recognized, what so many others hadn’t, that what Dan was talking about True Aiki. No! Somewhere I had thought I understood something essential but, in truth, did not. THAT, was not “okay” with me!

So, somehow, I forget how, I got Dan’s number or he got mine and we talked. Now, I didn’t want to begin our conversation with the understandable, yet inconvenient and inaccurate, assumption that my Aikido training was what most understood Aikido to be. By this, I am pointing out that the “standard flavor” of Aikido has strayed far from the roots of Ueshiba Morihei’s Daito Ryu, and most importantly, Daito Ryu’s True Aiki. There was a reason that my training had far more in-common with Koryu Jujutsu and Daito Ryu. I had long since grown accustomed to hearing, “That’s not Aikido!” or “That’s Daito Ryu!”

So I began our conversation with a very cheeky gambit. I told Dan that I thought that he was a Daito Ryu guy! He said something noncommittal like, “I see.” So I said, ” . . . and I bet you do solo body movement exercises, and I’m guessing that I can name them or describe them.”

At this point it was clear that he was amused at my presumptuousness , and he said, “Go on.” So I named or described 5 exercises that I had been taught that I thought were held in common with most Daito Ryu because they came from the the Daito Ryu that I had been taught, though my sense called it Aikido.

It turned out that I got 4 out of 5 correct. We spoke cordially and finally he asked me, “Why don’t you tell me what you think Aiki is!” Well, I did my best and 20/20 hindsight I think I wasn’t that far off the mark. Long story short, Dan agreed to come visit me at my house (Where my dojo is presently in my basement. It never was supposed to be, but there it is nevertheless! So much for the glamours of a world traveling Aikido sage!)

A New Beginning!

Dan comes into my “dojo” and looks around and states, “You do ken. Maybe we should start with ken!” Actually I love Ken! In fact, that is how I was first introduced to True Aiki by Shirata sensei. It was through ken. And I would have loved to have started with Dan in this way! Nevertheless, when Dan notices the lack of ceiling height and says, “Nah, maybe we should just spar. Is sparring okay?” Well, first, as you have already read in former blog posts, I loved to spar and delight in a scrap. Second, Shirata sensei had also taught quite a bit about atemi both how to receive and give or, more accurately, how to receive/give. So I said sure!

We kind of eased into things, but ramped up quickly. (Either you can do or you can’t!) Before I go further I should explain to those of us that haven’t sparred or rolled or whatever, that one can have a very thoughtful and through conversation without using any words while sparring, rolling, etc. In fact, this kind of conversation is often WAY more informative than words are. And, no, it doesn’t have to be violent.

This is how our conversation went (at least from my perspective):

We start sparring . . . I try to get past Dan’s defense and cannot. He begins to penetrate my defense. I respond by increasing my offense in an attempt to change his (and my) priorities.

Dan: Can you see that no matter how you attack your attacks mount to nothing?

Allen: Yes

Dan begins to allow his defense to simultaneously be attacks as well.

Dan: Can you see that no matter how you defend or attack, you cannot stop the success of my attack.

Allen: Yes (Beginning to get annoyed.)

Then Dan punches me in the chest and I literally become airborne and am caught by my guys before a land among my weight lifting equipment. This was no “hay maker” shot. In fact there was no visible difference between it and when he just touched me earlier. This was a “tap.”

Dan: Can you feel the power available?

Allen: Son of a . . . !

We get ready to spar some more and Dan pops me in the mouth stopping at my teeth.

(I have a weird tendency to smile when under stress. I enjoy being challenged I guess. Anyway, I learned in our next few meetings that this wasn’t a bad tendency since Dan would stop at the surface of my teeth whether my lips are in the way or not. In other words, smile and all will be well. Don’t smile and all will be well, but my lip will be split!)

Dan: Can you see that I can punch you whenever, wherever, at will, with power, AND control?

Allen: *&(^% !

We spar a couple of seconds more and Dan kicks me in the leg. Just a thigh shot. It was a kind of run of the mill, even funky looking, kind of kick. Shouldn’t be a big deal . . . accept it about takes my leg out from under me and I can feel my thigh begin to instantly cramp up.

Dan: . . . can you see that and I can kick you with power and control too?

Allen: Sh*t! Sh*t! Sh*t!

I try to go back to a cramped up, limping sparring. I try to focus on my purpose rather than allow bodily fear take the helm. I’m looking at what he is doing (as much as I can while he is touching me all over my head), and it is what I am supposed to be doing! I’m supposed to be spiraling in, while his attack is supposed to spiral out. My spiral should be flanking him whether or not I move, and his flank should be presenting itself to me every time he reacts. My attack is supposed to be my defense and his defense my attack. My attack and his attack should be my attack. He is supposed to be becoming “unglued” every time we touch. And each time should be worse for him and better for me than the time before. His attack should be negated, even turned around, and mine should be unimpeded, even invited. But his “doing” is working and mine is failing. His “doing” has more power than any human I know would want to endure and my (whatever power I can muster) is being rendered meaningless, not just in comparison, but in ability to apply it. I have no power to apply my power. He has the power to deliver his power and easily can deliver more power than my body can withstand, fight ending force, organ exploding force . . . and he hasn’t even really begun to exert himself.

One strike in Aikido can kill. When practicing always obey your instructor and do not use training time for needless testing of strength. ~ Ueshiba Morihei

I step back, throw up my hands and say, “What are you doing????!!!!”

Before I give you Dan’s response, let me describe my mental state at this point:

Up to this moment I had 30+ years of martial arts under my belt. Several of those years had included fighting of one kind or another. Many of the those that I had trained under were recognized as the best in their field, some the best in the world. I am not a natural athlete. Any ability I had was the product of hard work, and dogged determination. While I was, and likely never will be, mistaken for a martial phenom, I was confident in being able to stand my ground in this given scenario against pretty much anybody. I might not come out on top, but there would at least be a fight.

Now, here was a guy that, unless he tripped and fell or something, I would likely not be able to do to stop if he went bananas . . . and I had invited him into my home! At this moment any internal temper tantrum due to martial frustration and bruised ego faded into the background, drowned out by the roaring internal realization that my presumptuousness could have put my family and friends in potential danger. My brain scrambled, unaware of any pain, ignoring my fear and shame, focusing on a quick assessment of where things presently stood. Thankfully, my conclusion was that Dan was more likely to give his life protecting a family from danger than he was to be of any danger.

I’ve seen nothing to dissuade me from this initial assessment. Not that that Dan’s personality is your common “go along to get along type.” He, while perfectly pleasant, even charming, is too driven and passionate to ever be mistaken for “Melba toast” type of personality. Personally, I favor sincerity over pleasantry any day and I find Dan both sincere and pleasant.

As soon as I throw my arms up and say, “What are you doing!???” He immediately stops, breaks into a big smile, and says, “Wow! Do you know how great that is Allen?” Of course I’m thinking, “What? That I just got my @ss handed to me and don’t even know how you did it, or, that I don’t have a clue what to do about it!”

I must have look incredulous and dumbfounded because Dan went on; “I’m just so pleased. You just said the right thing!”

More dumfounded looks on my part.

“You don’t know how many men have stood where you are standing now and: Walked away frustrated, walked away in denial, or to their ignorance. When all they needed to do was ask, “What are you doing?”

Well, just between you and me, it honestly never occurred to me to do otherwise. I could tell that outwardly how he was using his body how I, at least thought, I was using my body. But he was clearly getting completely different results. He had to be doing SOMETHING different, but I couldn’t tell what! I hadn’t felt the total unnerving experience of being completely owned since Shirata sensei simply moved my ken to the side (it felt like magnetic resistance) and I saw death staring me in the face. But then, like now, the guy on the other side had no malice in his heart. Standing right before me was a guy having done the same thing . . . and again, ready to share without holding anything back.

Up to this moment I honestly had begun to doubt myself. I had begun to think that the experiences I had had with Shirata sensei were perhaps wistful exaggerations or perceptions of a less experienced self. And that the stories I’d heard from Shirata sensei were similarly a product of his adulation for his teacher magnified with each passing year. Perhaps I had plumbed the depths of what there was to learn and was nearing the end of what I was capable of doing.

Not true!

My memory was accurate. I knew what I knew and, more importantly, I now knew for certain now that I had missed something essential along the way and here was a second chance. No, it never occurred to me to do anything but ask for help. I could never live with myself if I had let an opportunity like this, a second chance at Aiki, pass by without at least an attempt at learning. I would be letting myself down, and betraying the trust placed in me by Shirata sensei before his passing. The least I could do was try to correct any misconceptions or mistakes made along the way.

It wasn’t long thereafter that I spoke with my guys and told them that I knew what I was going to do. I was going to stop everything, go back to the beginning, and start all over again.

Happily my guys said, that they would be joining me. Now, progress certainly wasn’t without its bumps. Typically I try to set aside all that I “know” when learning in an attempt not to “color” the information being given by a teacher. The worst thing I could do would be to think or say, “Oh I know that,” or “Oh we do that.” because doing so would be preclude any new learning. Another habit I have, is not to share what I’ve learned when I am being taught. First, I think it is presumptuous, and secondly, it impedes me from learning from others.

Both of these habits, however, backfired in the case of learning from Dan. I think it was during Dan’s first visit, that I quickly went upstairs to use the restroom before we were to resume practice after lunch. While I was away, my totally cheeky student Robert (who is a terrific training partner and skilled teacher) began “practicing on his own” Shirata sensei’s solo body movement exercises off in the corner of the room, but in plain sight of Dan.

[Now, it is important to me that this is very clear, I hadn’t been keeping these secret or anything, rather I had been concentrating on learning what Dan had to teach. If Dan had asked what I do, these would likely have been the first things I would have shared. Just as they were the first things I shared on my first trip to Europe years before.]

Anyway, I come hurrying down the stairs, turn the corner and there is Dan standing in the middle of the hallway leading to the dojo and all motion has stopped behind him.

“Allen . . . what have you been keeping from me?!?!”

Of course I don’t have a clue what is happening until I see the smirk on Roberts face and I ask him, “What’s going on???”

Robert replies innocently, “I was just warming up with Shirata’s TDD.”

I’m thinking, “Like hell you were!”

All this time Dan is staring at me like I had stealing his family secrets while hoarding mine own.

I don’t rightly recall, what I said at the time, probably just a lot of stammering and “um, uh’s.” But, but it was clear that there would be no further practice until I “came clean.”

[Again, I adamantly declare that I was not hiding anything, so there was no need to come clean. Nor am I continuing to hide anything, just for the record and for the future!]

So I showed the 13 solo body movement exercises that Robert had been doing. [There is more btw, just for the record.]

To everyone’s surprise Dan was almost apoplectic. Luckily for me, he was ecstatic rather than mad. (I’ve never seen Dan mad. Frustrated? Yes. Hurt? Yes. Mad? Thankfully no!) Dan was effusive and said a lot of things at that moment. I can’t recall everything, but a few notable things lodged in my memory:

“The man [Shirata] was a genius!”

“I am just SO happy. I had thought that this knowledge had been lost in Aikido. But here is proof that it hasn’t!”

“Don’t worry Allen, I won’t use this. This was given to you by Shirata sensei.”

From that moment onward Dan did nothing but encourage me to teach and share, for which I am very grateful.

Still, that didn’t mean the path has always been easy . . .

Upon Dan’s second (and last) visit to my dojo Dan stopped teaching in the middle of the Sunday class and asked me what was the matter.

I was completely depressed and explained, “I had a great teacher that didn’t hold anything back and tried his best to teach me before he died . . . and I didn’t get it! Now I have a great teacher that isn’t holding anything back and is trying his best to teach me . . . and I’m not GETTING IT! (Now on the verge of tears) I must be some kind of a two time looser!!!

Okay so I said I’ve never seen Dan mad, but this was probably the closest I’ve seen him get to being mad. Raising his voice and getting in my face,

“Well I never said that!! And I don’t THINK that!!

It wasn’t like I was going to argue . . . so I just shut up and just kept doing the best I could for the rest of the time.

Later I figured out my biggest mistake. I don’t know why (Dan certainly never said to do this, quite the opposite really.), but I had gone from “back burnering” Shirata sensei’s teaching to pursue Dan’s, to (stupidly) thinking that they were mutually exclusive. That being the case I preceded to misconstrue my understanding of Dan’s teaching such that it was different from Shirata’s. But as I slowly corrected my understanding of Dan’s teaching I realized that there was no difference whatsoever. Upon that realization, I knew that obviously Dan’s, Shirata’s and Ueshiba’s teachings should all align. And they did! So I could leverage the teachings of each teacher to understand the others! And, of course, the same could be done with other historical teachers that were teaching the same thing.

For a slow learner like me this proved to be invaluable.  Apparently, in my case, it takes a village to raise a Beebe brain!

Anyway, once I got out of my own way, progress skyrocketed and continues to do so!! It is simply amazing to me!

As I said earlier, I was taught that there is jujutsu, aiki-jujutsu, and aiki no jutsu. The Aiki no jutsu “waza” that I had learned were easy to identify. They made absolutely no sense whatsosever from a practical jujutsu perspective. As I used to tell my students, “Those are my “someday” techniques because right now I really don’t have a clue how they work. I just know that they do! (Because they were done to me.)”

6 years ago it was beginning to look like “someday” might never arrive.

And then I met Dan Harden.

Now someday is here!

My only regret with regards to training with Dan is that I haven’t been able to train with him more.  He has has much that he can teach and I have much that I can learn!  Sounds like a happy beginning to me!

Thanks Dan!

Liked it? Take a second to support Allen Dean Beebe on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

24 Comments

Fred Veer · February 20, 2017 at 1:27 pm

An incredibly honest story. It also shows the value of the old saying, acceptance of ignorance is the start of learning.

Wan Chi Lau · February 20, 2017 at 4:29 pm

What an awesome post! Thanks!!!

Greg · February 20, 2017 at 6:43 pm

So, now you see it grasshopper 🙂

Bob Nash · February 20, 2017 at 8:46 pm

This -‘ I knew that obviously Dan’s, Shirata’s and Ueshiba’s teachings should all align. And they did! So I could leverage the teachings of each teacher to understand the others! And, of course, the same could be done with other historical teachers that were teaching the same thing.’ – I had the same revelation. My teacher’s teachings and Dan’s totally align from my perspective. I was able to figure out much clearly what my teacher was trying to show me for the past 40 years after I started training with Dan. Once you make the connection you feel stupid since it was staring at you the whole time. But solo body conditioning is a prerequisite. And I don’t even do that silly so called martial art called Aikido.. 🙂

    Allen Dean Beebe · February 20, 2017 at 8:49 pm

    Kaboom!

    Daniel Harden · February 21, 2017 at 9:06 am

    “…And I don’t even do that silly so called martial art called Aikido.”.
    Well…you actually do, Bob!!
    Wado Ryu? IS aiki…do. Just that no one knows it. Your art has aiki all over the place. 🙂
    Dan

currawong · February 21, 2017 at 1:30 am

The thing I most feared meeting Dan was that I would have to throw out everything I knew and start again. What I found was the opposite — that I had been asking the right questions and focussing on the right things, but just needed what Dan had to teach to fill in the gaps.

I remember Dan saying at one point that when he started, he was complete rubbish, as well as his very positive response when I went up to him in the middle of trying an exercise and saying “Dan, what I’m doing is completely broken. Can you help me fix it?”. I remember these things as I struggle to get more than bits of what he taught working, and remind myself that it is going to take time and a lot of effort.

Lorel · February 21, 2017 at 4:59 am

Hey Allen,

How did Dan block your attacks?

    Daniel Harden · February 21, 2017 at 9:09 am

    It’s not a technique, Lorel.
    My body absorbs, redirects, and powers up, all at the same time. It just…is…Aiki.
    Now…(cough) then you have to know HOW to fight with it.
    Dan

      Lorel · March 5, 2017 at 12:33 am

      Ok. Since he wrote here on his blog I was wondering if he could expound more!

Allen Dean Beebe · February 21, 2017 at 6:12 am

Hi Lorel,

Thank you for the question. The answer is:. He didn’t block, he didn’t evade, he didn’t blend. He used Aiki.

For more information on that please refer to my posts on Aiki.

Thank you again for your question. That is an important point to highlight!

Allen

    Lorel · March 5, 2017 at 12:34 am

    Ok…how exactly did he do that?

      Allen Dean Beebe · March 5, 2017 at 7:19 am

      Lorel,

      “How exactly did he do that?” Is “exactly” what I’ve been writing about here. Which is why I wrote: “For more information on [exactly how he did] that please refer to my posts on Aiki.” “Exactly how he did that” is what trueaiki.com is all about. It’s in the name!

      I suggest all readers go back and re-read the posts multiple times now and after training for a month, a year, five years. The material is dense. I’m representing it the best I can here knowing that person to person is a must. The person doesn’t have to be me btw, just someone that knows and can do.

      I’m not done yet either. So don’t give up. I’m not. I’ll keep posting and hopefully there will be, “Ah Hah!” moments for various people along the way . . . including me!

      In the mean time, as I’ve written earlier, I suggest reading a lot and “kissing a lot of promising frogs.” One day, perhaps already, you’ll meet your “prince” or “princess” whose words and examples are clear to you.

      “The truth is out there!”

      Allen

Patrick De Block · February 21, 2017 at 11:18 am

Thanks Allen. My first encounter with Dan wasn’t as dramatic as yours, but it was just as convincing. Now that I think about it, you were there, writing strange things on the wall while moving strangely.

K.T. Grimaldi · February 21, 2017 at 1:05 pm

I have been training with Dan for almost ten years now. He is the real deal. More importantly he holds nothing back when it comes to his many decades of hard earned knowledge. If you are willing to learn and train hard he will change your training forever.

Fred Veer · February 23, 2017 at 3:37 am

Hi Allen,

After rereading it several times a question pops up.

If Dan thinks the TDD forms are a key to unlocking AIKI (and Dan please excuse me if I phrase it badly) what did you do wrong in the TDD forms.

Is there a specific physiological aspect that you need to focus on doing the TDD forms or does it need specific intent on part or all of the form.

I only saw a few of the forms two years ago in Zwolle and have seen them all or studied them in detail, although I really would like to study these in the necessary detail.

Could you go into this in detail in Zwolle in July ?

Fred

Allen Dean Beebe · February 23, 2017 at 6:54 am

Hi Fred,

I didn’t realize that you are THAT Fred! So, Hi again! 🙂

Everybody starts by copying the outer form. We can’t help it. That is what we see and even though good teachers may talk about what is going on inside, we can’t see it, so we have to guess at it. That is what an “intellectual understanding” is, a guess. It is a far cry from actual experience.

So, despite ourselves, we (both teachers and students) all start with “kata” even if we try not to. “Kata” means “form.” And Ueshiba Morihei accurately stated, “Aikido has no kata.” Because one cannot see Aiki, it is “formless.”

My big (and I mean BIG) mistake was, despite what sensei said, I focused on the outer forms and thought Western Sports Science would.cover the inner physical training stuff. This was, and is, wrong.

This answers Patrick’s question too. Dan raised the bar back up where it should be, and also helped to point me in the right direction. Shirata probably would have too, but he died before he could. That is what a teacher does besides trying to communicate this elusive stuff, a teacher keeps pointing us back to the direction we should be headed. We have to get there ourselves though. No teacher can “take us there” they can only point and say, “no, no, closer, no, YES! no, no, way no, closer, etc.”. It’s an invaluable job!

Dan “saw” what the TDD were meant to communicate. But Aiki is formless. So he can, and does, teach Aiki in the context of other forms (just as all martial, and non-martial, traditions that taught Aiki did.)

The TDD are about as “stupid proof” as one can get. So I had some Aiki traits born of outer form before I met Dan. But, and this Is important, as long as one is looking to outer visible forms for Aiki one is MAJORLY screwed!

Aiki is the union of equalized and opposite co-dependent, mutually arising forces (in very particular ways), which are invisible.

Of course you understand the scientific implications of that much better than I do I’m certain.

As an aside, I think science definitely has a “place at the table” here btw. It is presumptuous to think that science already explains Aiki. Science has the potential to explain most things but good scientists recognize that there is far more unexplained than explained, which is what makes science exciting! However, I think it equally presumptuous to declair that science can never explain Aiki even if the best scientific minds of our day were to be stymied (which they are not, they aren’t even looking . . . well maybe Fred is). But who can predict the future? That is what makes the future of science so exciting. IMHO.

Great question Fred!

We definitely can go into these in July. A weekend isn’t nearly enough time to learn what there is to learn. But we can start (actually you already have you just didn’t know it).

Thank you for your questions. Thank you for your presence at my seminars. And a BIG thank you for your interest in True Aiki (the thing and my blog 😉

Allen

Fred Veer · February 23, 2017 at 7:06 am

Thanks Allen for your response. And hope to see you soon so you can show what it means physically. Words are so limiting when discussing Aiki.

Fred

    Allen Dean Beebe · February 23, 2017 at 8:01 am

    Indeed. In fact I can only demonstrate (to the limits of my ability) the results of Aiki. Even inner physical movement and adaptation are not Aiki but the result of Aiki. Again, this is what makes things so confusing. Those that could Aiki would Aiki and say, “That is Aiki.” and those observing would look or feel the results and think, “Oh, THAT is Aiki.” And they would be wrong. The results are not the Aiki, they are the traits of Aiki.

    Oh well, more words!

    See you soon I hope,
    Allen

Marcus · March 8, 2017 at 4:18 am

Dear Allen,

thank you very much for this. When i read the smile/lips/teeth-thing i remember my first encounter with Dan. Pretty similar. Like you i was cheeky enough to ask him, what he will do, when i try to apply a jab or something like that. Never felt something like that. This is now two nearly two years ago. Amazing. Amazing that there are people outhere with similar experiences.

I’m very lucky to attend (at least) one day with you in Aachen.

And i hope that i’m able to follow you, i hope that i’ll pick up some tools to work with.

This first encounter with Dan was so impressive, but to be honest, i still got no clue what he was doing.

But you wrote that you arrived at someday… so there is hope for me as well.

Looking forward (and please excuse my english).

Marcus

Andres Urrutia · July 21, 2017 at 5:35 am

Hello Allen,
Very interesting post. I really enjoyed reading your first encounter with Dan Harden. One thing my mind has not been able to wrap around of your first sparring with Dan is that if Shirata Sensei taught you essentially the same knowledge that Dan was taught then why you were not able to recognize it, or either further neutralize or counteract it? I could understand that if both of you had same theoretical /conceptual knowledge/framework but Dan is more advanced in its practice, there’s a likelihood you cannot counteract Dan’s aiki. But my impression from your dramatic words is that you did not even grasp Dan’s “use of aiki power”; totally understandable would be for me if one has a different knowledge from the other, but this would contradict that Shirata Sensei transmitted same knowledge to you. I will appreciate your insights to my blindness.
Respectfully,
Andres

    Allen Dean Beebe · July 23, 2017 at 9:38 am

    Dear Andres,

    Shirata sensei taught me everything that Dan taught. (Keeping in mind that I haven’t trained with Dan for quite a while now.) Many of the things that they taught were word for word identical.

    Here is the big catch: Having been taught, and having learned, are two very different things. Being both over simplistic and completely unfair to Shirata sensei, I’ll say that what I learned was what I could see. What I could see was outward spiral movements. (In my own defense, many others didn’t even pick up on that.)

    So, this is very important: As I have said several times before, Aiki cannot been seen.

    I had learned the effective use of spiral movement in outward form. This is not Aiki. I had been taught Aiki, the True Aiki. I just hadn’t learned it yet.

    So, when Dan spoke or wrote I recognized what he was saying. When we got together I recognized the outer form of what he was doing. I was “doing” that too (the outer form.). I also recognized the results of Aiki, the results I felt from Shirata sensei, the results I felt from Dan, the results I could not (at that time) produce.

    How to produce those results (Aiki) is what I wanted to learn. I had been taught how, but had not learned it yet.

    Now, just to be clear. Just because Dan (or Shirata or I) teach true Aiki, is absolutely no guarantee that true Aikido will be learned. In fact, based on history, it is very likely that most will not learn true Aiki, even when directly taught.

    If you will recall, win the story of how I met Dan, I mention that at one point I despaired that, even having beaten all odds and having found another teacher to teach me true Aiki, I still hadn’t learned true Aiki.

    Fortunately, that time has passed and now I am progressing consistently.

    Shirata did his best, Dan is doing his best, and I am doing mine. (Not that I am putting myself of the same level as either of those men.) That is all we can do, and keep trying to improve. One on one, I have good results so far and hopefully that will only improve. I am sure that Shirata would have straightened me out if he had lived, but he ran out of time. Happily I met Dan.

    Sadly, the majority of the people will likely learn the words, some will learn the models, fewer will learn the outer form and fewer still will have the opportunity, and do what it takes to learn true Aiki.

    In the end, history proves over and over again, one does need a teacher, but the most important teacher of all is one’s self. Without the audacity to think outside the box of what one is being taught to adapt that teaching to how one learns, no learning will take place.

    Teachers can only teach what they know, and what they know is largely what works for them (not necessarily what works for you.)

    So, great question! And very important to understand if one wants to really progress.

    In the end it comes down to results. Not pedigree, lineage, licenses, organizations, number of students, popularity, etc. The greats didn’t need any of that. They just needed to be undeniably great in deed.

    Let’s think about that. Sokaku, Ueshiba, etc. were recognized by many, many of the martial greats of their time (sometimes begrudgingly so), not because of what they said, but because of what they could do at an elite level. It was undeniable.

    That is the true Aiki that I wanted, am learning and would like to share the best that I can. Even if a little bit gets out there, it is better than that little bit of teaching becoming extinct.

    I’m writing this on my iPhone. So, please forgive the roughness of the reply. I’m sending it because I have a connection and my phone is at 15%.

    Please ask any other questions you might have. I’ll respond when I can!

    All the best,
    Allen

Leave a Reply