My last explanation contrasted the term Kakete with Atemi in an attempt to clarify that Atemi can stand as a separate skill set. The study of Atemi as a separate skill is unfamiliar to many practitioners of Aiki arts. Taking the initiative to apply techniques proactively in Aiki arts is extremely rare. Therefore, I am adding further clarification of both the terms “atemi” and “kakete” in this blog.

Virtually all techniques may be applied proactively. I reiterated the importance of proactive engagement when employing techniques as taught by Takeda Sokaku and Ueshiba Morihei in the realms of law enforcement and military engagement.

When learning Aiki for the first time, it is actually much simpler to grasp the technique as the recipient rather than as the initiator. This is why most teachers of Aiki demonstrate by delivering Aiki. It is because Aiki feels different from Jujutsu. If one cannot feel the difference, one cannot differentiate Jujutsu from Aiki Jujutsu. It must be felt.

Once you have a clear understanding of what Aiki entails and how it should feel, the most effective approach is to master the art of generating Aiki through solitary body movement. I’ll explain why in a moment.

In partner practice, it is easier to learn to produce Aiki if one is not the initiator. This isn’t due to some moral reasoning. Moving proactively often leads to resistance, both internally and externally. This is contradictory to the fundamental principles of generating Aiki. It is important to note that the same can be said about moving reactively. This is why it is best to extensively practice solo movement before engaging with another human. Once one can produce Aiki individually, one can begin to practice doing so while in contact with a partner. This is far easier to say than to do. Virtually everyone changes their body movement when they come into contact with another individual. Having learned how to move individually, one at least has a baseline to return to after messing up. At this point, it is more convenient to be the recipient of contact rather than being the one who initiates contact with one’s partner first.

In solo practice one seeks to balance forces within one’s self. To interact with others, start by balancing your own forces. Then, continue to do so when you are in contact.

In order to effectively utilize Aiki when interacting with others, it is crucial to first have a thorough understanding of it and consistently demonstrate its principles individually as well as with a partner in a receptive manner. Why? It’s hard to initiate movement that involves contacting another person without adopting a mindset of “self vs other.” This mindset creates resistance and prevents the creation of Aiki.

Hakaru Mori defines “Kakete” as follows:

““Kakete” (掛手) is, when facing an opponent in combat, a technique that is applied to an opponent preemptively without waiting for an attack.

The converse of this situation is called “Ukete” (受手), in which technique is initiated after receiving an opponent’s attack. Most Daito-ryu technique are Ukete. Normally, Kakete is first taught only after one has significantly high rank.”

Here is a link to the article: https://www.aikidosangenkai.org/blog/hakaru-mori-kakete-aiki-jutsu/amp/ Christopher Li’s Sangenkai Blog is suggested reading for anyone interested in Daito Ryu and/or Aikido history.

Read “Hakaru Mori on Kakete and Aiki no Jutsu” by Hakaru Mori, translated by Christopher Li, for more details.

https://www.aikidosangenkai.org/blog/hakaru-mori-kakete-aiki-jutsu/amp/

Christopher Li’s Sangenkai Blog is suggested reading for anyone interested in Daito Ryu and/or Aikido history.

I want to clarify that I am not affiliated with the Takumakai group, nor did I have the privilege of being a student under the guidance of Hakaru Mori. Consequently, I don’t claim that the “kakete” I practice is the same as theirs. The definitions continue to be pertinent. This comes as no surprise. Shirata Riniro was Ueshiba Morihei “stand-in” teacher during the period that O-sensei was teaching Hisa Takuma Daito Ryu in Osaka.

Atemi, which translates to “striking the body” in Japanese, is an important aspect of many martial arts practices. It involves delivering precise strikes to vulnerable areas of the body to incapacitate an opponent. Atemi can be delivered through punches, kicks, knee strikes, elbow strikes, and even finger strikes. The goal is to precisely attack critical areas like pressure points, nerve centers, and soft tissues in order to inflict pain and disrupt the balance of our opponent. By targeting these vulnerable areas, the practitioner can effectively disable an opponent without relying solely on strength or size. The use of atemi techniques in self-defense situations proves to be remarkably effective, giving those who practice them the ability to swiftly incapacitate an assailant. It is crucial to bear in mind that atemi strikes should always be employed responsibly, as they have the potential to inflict severe harm or even result in loss of life. Atemi techniques are integrated into the training syllabus of numerous martial arts styles to amplify the effectiveness of their techniques and cultivate a versatile martial artist.

Atemijutsu is different from Jujutsu, Aikijujutsu, and Aiki no Jutsu. Although, it can be applied with those should one choose to.

I’ll conclude by reminding that all of these can be considered “tools” in one’s “tool box” of knowledge. Mastering one skill, let alone all possible skills, does not ensure invincibility, enlightenment, or peace in our time.

Liked it? Take a second to support Allen Dean Beebe on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!
Categories: Relating to Aiki

4 Comments

Fred Veer · October 19, 2023 at 9:34 am

Hi Allen,

Thanks for this column. It explains a lot and ties in with my current personal training.

It also raises the next questions.

If daito ryu is Sogo Bujutsu

is the aikido of Shirata sensei intended to be a Sogo Bujutsu ?

And if this is so, is the aikikai hombu aikido an incomplete Sogo Bujutsu ?

Regards, fred

Allen Dean Beebe · October 20, 2023 at 7:28 am

Hi Fred,

総合 Sogo means “synthesis” but in the context of martial arts it often has the connotation of “complete” or “total.” Therefore, when one refers to it as a “sogo budo” or “sogo bujutsu,” they are asserting that it is a martial art of utmost “completeness” or “totality”.

In the context of bujutsu the term “sogo” calls to my mind the term “juhappan.” Juhappan (十八般 “Eighteen Kinds”) is a selection of combat techniques and martial skills used by the samurai of Tokugawa-era Japan. Unsurprisingly, the concept is based on earlier Chinese traditions, such as the Eighteen Arms of Wushu.

Wikipedia provides an example of possible skills included in such a list. While the specific contents may vary depending on the tradition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugei_jūhappan

As one can see, covering all of these skills would be quite the undertaking in today’s world. Understandably, traditions that may have covered all of these skills in the past have necessarily pared them down over time. Nevertheless, some Kobudo pride themselves on maintaining an expansive scope of various arts, while usually being particularly well known for one.

In my experience, the term “Sogo Budo” is used as a term of differentiation, it was in the article. Usually, it is meant to imply that one’s art isn’t limited like some others. I have heard the term used this way both in the context of “Kobudo” and “Gendai Budo.”

The term is so widely applicable that practically anyone can use it because whether one form of art is considered “total” or “comprehensive” is ultimately subjective.

Thanks,
Allen

ajaysbal · October 29, 2023 at 8:58 pm

Hi Allen,
I’ve been going through your material, Chris Li’s publications, taiji material, and some of the things shared by the various masters on Masahiro Shioda’s channel, and taking into account things Mike Sigman has said. I think I have to disagree with how you render the metaphors of Ueshiba. If I were to make an attempt,
I would say that mu represents emptiness (both in terms of the lack of a universe and in terms of lack of intent)
Ichi rei represents fullness (intent/ universe)
Ni ki is heaven and earth (more specifically down and up), this can be read as Fg and Fn aswell as exhale and inhale
San gen is 3 pairs of in/yo relationships (Ten – Kokyu/ chi – Fg and Fn /Jin – Mind and body)
Shi kon is a reference to the 4 cardinal directions which in itself might be a reference to the 5 elements model offered in taiji
Hachi riki is an almost 1-1 explanation of the inyo relationships found within the body when interacting with force in taiji, with the shi kon directions being the relationships with linear momentum while the 4 corners are connections with angular momentum.
Curious to hear your thoughts,
Ajay

    Allen Dean Beebe · October 31, 2023 at 12:34 pm

    Hi Ajay,

    Reliable, tangible, empirical results are far more important to me than any model that attempts to explain those results. This is because a model, by definition, is “a finger pointing to the moon” not the moon itself. I find it interesting to compare models as a side note. But for me, the bottom line is: Is the model getting me the results I want? If it is not, it is time for me to get, or create, a better model, or to figure out a better understanding. Experience, tangible, and reliable results are “the grand ultimate.” I hope you get the results that you desire!

    All the best,
    Allen

Leave a Reply