TrueAiki.com reader Robin Scheachter. posted a really great question in response to my blog https://trueaiki.com/ooooooo-what-takuma-hisa-said/  and I thought the subject worthy of its own post so here it is.  Robin wrote:

Hello Mr Beebe

I’ve got to proceed my comment by saying that I don’t practice Aikido or Diato ryu, am not familiar with Takuma Hisa, don’t read Japanese and am certainly not able to manifest Aiki in the way he describes. However…

The quote you begin this article with suggests an alternative interpretation to me.

A number of writers on conflict, most notably Rory Miler and Marc MacYoung, draw a distinction between social and asocial violence. The former being primarily concerned with display and disputes over status and the latter being predatory behaviour. My understanding is that those involved in social violence are often aware of the build up to physical conflict. In contrast, predatory violence is generally carried out in such a way as to ensure the ‘victim’ is unaware or surprised by the escalation to physical conflict.

Could Hisa be commenting on the depth to which connection (Kokyu Ryoku?) and Aiki are integrated into an individual? I have heard teachers of IP make distinctions between being able to manifest connection in solo practice, co-operative paired practice, semi co-operative work and free sparing. I would argue that co-operative, semi co-operative and sparing practice fall into the category of social violence. It seems logical to me that the varying levels of psychological stress and adrenaline response provoked by different conflicts affects a practitioners ability to put their training, connection/Aiki included, to use. The manipulation or surprise that is the hallmark of asocial violence then adds an additional level of challenge, potentially preventing an individual that is capable of using Aiki in free sparing from dealing with a surprise attack. When he says “Aiki must stand this first clash of the enemy” was Hisa saying that only individuals able to instinctively manifest Aiki in the most extreme of situations are truly practicing Aiki?

If this is the case, it is a contentious point. It also brings up questions about how this material is taught and the affect this has on how it is manifested. Again Miller, amongst others, focuses on intellectual learning, learning through play and operant conditioning as teaching methodologies for skills to be used in conflict situations.

I’m particularly interested in the extent to which we can, or want to be ‘on’ continuously and/or whether we want to be able to switch ‘on’ at will. I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on this as a person with far more experience of this material then myself.

I also hasten to add that I wholeheartedly agree with the points you make in your article! I’m just interested in the other potential interpretations.

All the best and happy training.

Robin Schaechter

Here is my reply:

Hi Robin,

I agree that consciously selected forms of conflict training and competition can be placed in the category of “social violence.”  Such conflicts are expected, and to some degree regulated.  Predatory attacks are usually unexpected, advantageous to the predator, and unregulated.  It makes sense that Aiki techniques and responses which rely upon complex motor skills, acutely accurate perception, and are sourced in the parts of the brain that tend to go “offline” in the type of adrenaline dump that so frequently follows a predatory attack will likely go “offline” themselves. I agree that this was likely Takuma Hisa’s point.

As you pointed out, reactions relevant to both social violence and predatory violence can be habituated through relevant practice exercises.  Many if not most martial arts training regimens are geared toward dealing with, and in some cases dealing out, social violence as opposed to predatory violence.

A friend of mine proudly told me that she had just learned knife defense in preparation for her black belt test in the art she was studying.  She wanted to show me.  She told me how to attack her and signaled that she was ready.  She performed her defense as I am certain her instructor had taught her.  I complimented her on her efforts and asked her if she wouldn’t mind if I showed her a knife attack later on.  She happily agreed.

So I waited for a moment when she was separate from our coworkers.  I asked an individual to go ask her a question.  While she was answering the question I walked up behind her and “stabbed” her about 5 times in the back with a small stick I had picked up before she turned around.  She instantly smiled at me and asked what in the world I was doing?  I told her I was showing her a knife attack as we had previously discussed.  I had, of course, taken advantage of the difference between social violence and predatory violence.  I suggested that, while her martial arts training certainly had benefits, she would do well to also consider far more likely possibility of predatory violence as well.  I did this because I cared about her.  I also did this because I had the benefit of having been unexpectedly “shanked” by one of my students one day.  It was a well orchestrated “kill” and it was both an edifying” and valuable experience.

 

What is missing and often overlooked in these discussions is that when one develops an Aiki body/mind, over time, there are long lasting anatomical and neurological changes present that can only be “undone” in the same manner, over time.  I’ll make an analogy.  If one were to develop a body/mind that is well prepared for Mma, one’s techniques might go out the window in a predatory attack, but the benefit of one’s physical and mental conditioning could very well provide some advantage.  So, to the degree that one has developed an Aiki body/mind, that is a body/mind very different in internal development and response than an ordinary athletic body/ mind, that is the body/mind they have use in the world.  It can’t be “taken away” by a shock.  To the degree that one’s Aiki body/mind is developed, when it is interacted with, “techniques” (odd Aiki derivative results) will “happen.”  This is exactly what those with Aiki body/minds have said.  It has also been my growing experience.

Now, there is a big difference between having a developed Aiki body/mind, and having a developed Aiki body/mind AND effective training for social violence and/or predatory violence.  Obviously, the latter has an advantage in the context of social and/or predatory violence.

However, everything has a limit.  That limit is reached very quickly in a world where even moderately advanced technological weaponry is present

This of course means that whether one is engaged in conventional physical development, Aiki development, social violence or even predatory violence, the scope of viability is severely limited.  This is the reason that law enforcement and military personnel carry weaponry, weapon retainment, and why much of modern combat training is focused on deployment of weaponry.

With regards to Aiki . . .

There is the big difference between developing Aiki techniques, and developing an Aiki body/mind.  Furthermore, training Aiki techniques has proven to be rather ineffective at developing an Aiki body/mind.  That is to say, one can spend decades practicing Aiki techniques and never develop the ability to manifest the attributes that make Aiki attractive in the first place.  This is why there were practices for training Aiki techniques, and practices for developing an Aiki body/mind.

Aiki techniques are fine, but they suffer from some of the same inherent weakness that other techniques do.  A well developed Aiki body/mind can be advantageous in dealing with combat, especially when coupled with relevant training.  However, that to has limitations.  

Tactically, realistically knowing one’s strengths and weaknesses is an advantage.  Ignorance is almost always a disadvantage.

Thank you Robin for such a great question!,

Allen

 

 

True Aiki is free for all to read, but it is not free.  As little as $1 can help to cover expenses and possibly add features to True Aiki.

Thank You!

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Please consider becoming a patron of Allen Dean Beebe's True Aiki.  Your ongoing support will best assure the continuance and growth of True Aiki.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR GENEROUS SUPPORT!become_a_patron_button

Liked it? Take a second to support Allen Dean Beebe on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!
Categories: Relating to Aiki

1 Comment

Robin Schaechter · September 7, 2018 at 11:35 pm

Hi Allen

Thanks for such a well though out and comprehensive response!

I think I need to go back and really define the word Aiki in my own mind. I’ve been using it interchangeably with other, somewhat muddy terms like ‘internal power/strength’ and ‘connection’. The idea that the word Aiki could be applied to a technique without the movement manifesting (or at least aiming to manifest) the qualities we are aiming for simply hadn’t occurred to me.

I do make a distinction between the qualities that can be manifested in solo practice (extension of the spine, tonus in the connective tissue etc) and those that exist in relationship to another (avoiding direct opposition of force and others?). However I’m not even sure this distinction is a valid one as lots of the IP training I’ve been exposed to seems to suggest maintaining the solo qualities and moving irrespective of your partners actions plays a significant role in Aiki work.

In my experience, and this is indicative of my level of training, the qualities I can manifest in solo work are difficult to manifest even when doing simple push tests and must be consciously sought and maintained. My working explanation for this is partly that I’ve not conditioned these qualities to the point that they are a subconscious part of how I am (the end point of a long process by all accounts!) In part, I also think that it is to do with the social conditioning we all have (in differing forms and to differing degrees). One of the things I’ve learned in martial arts is how not to respect someones personal space. I’ve seen people contort themselves trying not to be impolite while simultaneously trying to throw there partner to the ground! I’m still looking at the subtle ways my social conditioning affects how I interact in co-operative practice. Would you say that examining and changing how you view and interact with people is a necessary step towards Aiki?

To try and sum up then: Ultimately, Aiki must work in a real fight. In order to do this it must be an automatic part of your being. Your ability to manifest Aiki on someone else is dependent on you ‘internal’ development. The process of creating a body/mind capable of manifesting Aiki ‘hard wires’ this state into you, meaning that you stand a chance of it working for you in a fight. Is this anywhere close to the point? I hope it is, because my head hurts!

Thanks and all the best.

Rob

Leave a Reply