UESHIBA MORIHEI – What “No One” Could Understand.

Due to the esoteric terms, analogies, and metaphors that Ueshiba Morihei commonly used in his lectures, many, if not most, of the individuals present at his lectures stated that they could not understand what it was he was talking about.  These statements were so ubiquitous, that it became commonly assumed, or common “knowledge,” that nobody could understand Ueshiba Morihei’s lectures.

This is a rather convenient assumption, isn’t it? It allows for the re-interpretation, and translation of, his message, by all that followed afterward.  If one understood his lectures and could explain them, the bar would be raised for all others that attended the lectures to show an equivalent level of understanding, or suffer loss of face.  If one understood his lectures and could explain them, the die would be cast.  There would be Ueshiba Morihei’s explanation of Aikido, and everyone else’s.

THE “NO ONE” THAT UNDERSTOOD

Shirata Rinjiro was a pioneer in the early days of Aikido. He taught in Ueshiba Morihei’s place at Omoto’s paramilitary branch, the Budo Senyokai.  He taught in Ueshiba’s Osaka dojo, and at the Asahi Dojo in Osaka. Shirata was around for the publishing of Aiki Jujujutsu Densho, which later was renamed Budo Renshu.  And, he also took ukemi for Ueshiba in the 1935 film Budo.  c14ac0d8c5da09cabc7e2be77562de13-2.jpgBefore being called up to become the Commander of a Division in the war, Shirata was tapped by Ueshiba to become a ‘Professor of Aikido’ at the University in Manchukuo.  (Tomiki Kenji went to Manjukuo instead.) After the war, he was repatriated to Japan. And in time, he was eventually called back into Aikido service by his teacher Ueshiba Morihei.  Ueshiba asked him to look after, and support, his son Kisshomaru.  So, he became head of the Tohoku region, head of Yamagata prefecture, and President of the International Aikido Federation, for a time.  Unlike Tomiki, Mochitsuki, and Shioda senseis, Shirata chose not to distance himself from, and continued to work in support of,  his teacher Ueshiba Morihei and the Ueshiba family throughout his life.

Those that were close to Shirata sensei know that this decision was not always easy for him. In many ways, the direction that Aikido took after Ueshiba’s retirement did not accord with what Shirata sensei had been taught, and how it had been taught, and what he knew Aikido to be. Perhaps this is one reason why Shirata and, the much younger, Saito Morihiro got along as well as they did.  Nevertheless, to fulfill his debt to his teacher, Shirata outwardly supported the direction set forth by Ueshiba Morihei’s successors.

It now is clear to me, that, towards the end of his life, sensei knew the end was coming. One example of this is the amount I was taught, and the rate at which I was taught it.

 

Initially I was shown physical basics, such as the Tandoku Dosa. When I could adequately demonstrate to sensei my performance of these, he immediately began to show technical basics, such as how the Tandoku Dosa related to foundational waza. When I could demonstrate the foundational waza, he began teaching a plethora of techniques and variations. There were so many I am afraid that I have begun to forget. I was also shown techniques that, at the time, I had no understanding of how they functioned, or what made them “tick.” I knew they worked because they worked on me. I knew what they looked like, because I could see the outer form. But I had no idea WHAT made them work. They didn’t conform to the “logic” of jujutsu.  I now know that this collection of techniques functioned solely via Aiki. Unfortunately, I didn’t get the chance to receive further instruction on these before sensei died. About this time, I was also taught things less directly physical in nature, such as the Hagurozan Yamabushi no Gyo.

In the last years of his life, Shirata sensei both wrote and taught until he could no longer do so. During this time, he finished the katas that were the summation of his study of Sho Chiku Bai Ken and Jo. He also wrote the essay that will be presented over the next several weeks.

Near the very end, when I invited him to open my dojo in Oregon, Shirata sensei replied in a letter explaining that he regretted not being able to come, but asked me to understand that it was because he was physically unable to, and that he had turned down Nidai Doshu as well.

On May 29th, 1993 Shirata Rinjiro passed away.

WHAT “NO ONE” UNDERSTOOD, Explained in an Essay

The following essay was included in a publication entitled “Misogi” in 1992 sponsored by the Yamagata Ken Aikido Renmei and Tohoku Aikido Renmei.

By and large, it is Shirata Sensei’s explanation of Ueshiba Morihei’s teaching. Many deshi testify that they did not understand Ueshiba’s lectures about Aikido. Even Shirata sensei humbled himself by saying the same at times. However, by the time that we are done reviewing his essay, I think that you will agree that Shirata Rinjiro understood very well what Ueshiba was saying, how he was saying it, and what it meant.  He covers these areas in the beginning years of Ueshiba’s teaching, right up  until the end of Ueshiba’s life.

I will be presenting this seminal work here in parts. The translation was completed by Mr. Douglas Walker, with me consulting. When Mr. Walker was unsure of the intended meaning of a passage, he would bring it to me. I would say what I thought sensei meant in the passage, and invariably Doug would say, “I think you are right, because Shirata says as much on the next page.” It was reassuring to me that I knew my teacher’s mind, and wasn’t misrepresenting him, which has always been my concern. I am very grateful to Mr. Walker for his hard work and effort in making this work available to English readers.  When I have finished presenting all the parts of the essay, I plan to make available downloads of both the complete translation and the original in Japanese, for further educational exploration.

I will be providing commentary after Shirata Rinjiro’s translated text is presented. I hope that this commentary will help lead to further understanding of the text.

Ueshiba’s writing is typically multi-layered in meaning and symbolism. Shirata’s writing is a bit more systematic and easily followed. Nevertheless, he too, at times, delivers his message via oblique implication rather direct statement. This is particularly true when his message is critical.

As previously stated, it will take many posts to complete the entire essay. We will need to be patient. It will be well worth the wait!

So, we start at the beginning:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

Renewal Through Keiko

Create A New Self With Daily Keiko[i]

Shirata Rinjirō, Kaichō, Tōhoku Aikidō Renmei

Misogi ©1992 Yamagata Ken Aikidō Renmaei and Tōhoku Aikidō Renmei

Dōka[ii]

True victory. Self victory. With loving concern

I do aiki and salvation, my soul is revived!

正勝 吾勝 御親心に 合気して 救い 生かすは 己が御魂ぞ

A sword is brandished. The opponent thinks I am in front of them

The attack comes and I am behind them

太刀振るい 前にあるかと 襲い来る 敵の後に 我は立ちけり

The way of the gods from ancient times. Oh polished sword,

Become transparent! Shine brightly! In divine love

惟神 錬り上りたる 御剣は 澄めよ 光れよ 神の愛に

 

 

[i] 稽古産新・稽古の徳で日々新たなる自己創造を産み出せ

[ii] 道歌 dōka, songs or poems of the way. The dōka in this essay are taken from the writings of Ueshiba Morihei, founder of aikidō.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Allen Dean Beebe’s Commentary:
Doka (Songs of the Way)
The phrase “Masa Katsu A Katsu” is well known among Aikidoists. It takes on a whole new relevance to those developing the ability to Aiki. To be able to Aiki one must reprogram one’s inherent mental programs and rebuild one’s body to align with and support the new program. This takes time, patience and care. Aiki is something that one does, in that one balances dual opposing forces in a specific manner. The manner is such that there is no-resistance, as opposed to resistance or avoidance. Many individuals that have undergone this self-reprogramming / re-building process have found it to be transformative. Their way of BEING in the world is fundamentally changed.

“A sword is brandished,” the mind of opposition arises. The mentality that, “Sees an opponent!” engenders a mind/body of resistance or avoidance. It is not an Aiki mind/body. “The opponent (there is now an adversarial relationship in the attacker’s mind so opponents are created.) thinks I am in front of them.” For one who is “one with the universe,” that is one who brings Ni Ki (Yin Yang) into balance, there is no front or back. There is unity. “The attack comes” (the physical manifestation of the mind that opposes), “and I am already behind them. This is the perception of the “attacker.” And, it is a very nice description of the outcome of Aiki #2. The oncoming force is met (not opposed or avoided) orthogonally. There is a resultant force vector and path for the “attacker.” For the one manifesting Aiki, there is no opposition, therefore no resistance feedback or diminishment of power, only continuation of Aiki. The attacker will perceive that the “opponent” is behind him. But for the one manifesting Aiki, there is only a continuity of centered balance.

 

Blank.gif
“The attack comes and I am already behind them.”

“The sword of the gods of ancient times” is the Ame no Murakumo no Tsurugi sword written of in the Kojiki. (Although this same sword predates the Kojiki considerably, by its presence in Mikkyo symbolism.) This sword is double edged symbolizing the unity of opposites. “Oh polished sword, Become transparent! Shine brightly!” “Polished” is related to the cleaning of a mirror. It is a symbolic representation of Misogi purification. It is “transparent” in the sense that it reflects reality without distortion with no hint of “self,” only “thusness.” “Shine brightly” is a referent to enlightenment. In fact, one can see a similar referent in the word “enlightenment” itself.

ab718bafe05464ef2959034745eea5ae
Fudo Myoo holding a double edged sword.

Shirata sensei begins his essay with three of Ueshiba’s doka. They foreshadow much of what is to come and how it is to be approached. In the essay, sensei explains how Ueshiba taught in the early years, and how his teaching changed over time. It wasn’t that the essence of WHAT he taught changed so much. It really didn’t. But HOW he taught it, and to what end, changed considerably. The basic pattern is as follows: Parochial (limited or narrow outlook or scope), to Broader, to Universal.

Shirata sensei both understood this, having lived through all the phases of Ueshiba’s teaching, and also having lived through the events that prompted the transformation.  Shirata recognized how the essential content being taught (Aiki), and the message accompanying its delivery, became separated over time. Therefore, he also witnessed the growing misunderstanding by so many, over time.

Consequently, as one of his last acts, he wrote this essay.

And so it begins!


The next section is entitled: “Concerning Aikido” and is broken into two sections; “As Aiki,” and “As Aikido”

Beginning with “As Aiki” we begin to hear Shirata sensei’s voice directly.  Fear not!  This essay isn’t just a collection of Ueshiba quotes.  There are are quite a few quotes in the essay, but there is much, much more!!

But that is for next week.

In the post after that Shirata “breaks it down and lays it out.” It is here where we really begin to see the depth and breadth of his knowledge and understanding. (I can hardly wait!!!)

 

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “UESHIBA MORIHEI – What “No One” Could Understand.

  1. Sounds great Allen, can’t wait for the rest. So much to dig your teach into.
    “This sword is double edged symbolizing the unity of opposites. “Oh polished sword, Become transparent! Shine brightly!” “Polished” is related to the cleaning of a mirror. It is a symbolic representation of Misogi purification. It is “transparent” in the sense that it reflects reality without distortion with no hint of “self,” only “thusness.” “Shine brightly” is a referent to enlightenment.”
    The double edge also shows that it cuts both ways; my own Ego as well as the others Ego. ‘Become transparent’ means we must throw light upon ourselves and the other so we can cleanse, purify (Misogi) our misrepresentation, our false sense of self. Polished through practice, through introspection, through self observation, through dialogue and interaction, through contact. Self reflection. We’re talking spiritual liberation here.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I have read some translations of O Sensei’s teaching, and it always seemed to me that he was so far advanced that it was difficult for him to express what he had come to understand. But to just give up and say nobody could understand what he was saying is lazy.
    In the West, we expect teachers to spoon-feed us. Almost all the work of transfer of information/understanding is regarded as the responsibility of the teacher.

    In Ueshiba’s time, and earlier times in Japan, it was the other way around: the teacher just did what he could do, and it was up to students to make the effort to try to understand and learn.

    I look forward to reading the essay.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Allen
    It would seem to me that the “the physical manifestation of the mind that opposes” is a part of current training model for most. The moment you “try” to blend, you look for an effect in the other when they grab you or even when searching to “connect” with the attacker’s center creates in part in you the mind that opposes. Looking forward to the continued reading. Thanks again……
    Gary

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Gary,

      Yes, we don’t have to rely upon opinion here. If one doesn’t find instances of Ueshiba speaking of “blending,” “getting off of the line of attack,” or “connecting with another’s center,” in order to control or throw another. Those ideas likely come from a source other than Ueshiba.

      Let’s keep an eye out for occurrences of this model later in the essay. Its presence or absence may tell us something!

      Allen

      Like

  4. Water does not oppose the stone nor the stone the water. Nevertheless they make contact. Neither reactive or responsive each follow their nature. How can we speak of opposing forces? We meet and we blend. How can we say there’s a division? Mind meets mind, where is the conflict?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Just some thoughts: (Aimed at no one in particular)

    It is important to consider the views and teachings of the teachers in the past “in the raw” as much as is possible. It is also important to consider their “raw” words in context to further our understanding. We owe our past teachers the kind of respect that assumes that they can speak think and speak for themselves.

    After that, it can be useful to contemplate what has been taught, what we have learned, and share the results of that exploration with others if they .

    It is never, helpful to attribute one’s thoughts, or teaching to another. Often this is done in order to gain credibility, to fulfill a personal agenda. simply by mistake, or to even “honor” one’s teacher. In any of these instances, however, the result is misinformation and the promotion of ignorance.

    End of thought!

    Like

  6. Thank you, Allen, for your efforts in sharing this information. I already have an expanded view of the classic Doka involving my partner being in front of me while I’m (ideally) already behind him.

    I am so looking forward to reading future offerings and working to incorporate these teachings into my practice.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Chuck,

      Thank you for your comments. I am happy to hear that you have found the work beneficial. There is more to come.

      I’m going to ask you a favor. If there are any points that seem unclear to you or don’t make sense, can you ask me about them?

      The whole point of this work is to pass things on to others. If I am not being successful at that, I want to do what I can to remedy the situation. But I can only know if I’m being successful at communicating or not via feedback.

      Thanks again!,
      Allen

      Like

  7. Hi Allen,
    I found your posts on ‘Training the torso’ and ‘Back Bow’ extremely useful. Off late you’ve not done any posts on ..shall I say ‘Practical aiki’. I request you to write on some more aiki exercises..once in a while at-least. Thanks

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Adarsh,

      Thank you for your request. The present article will take several weeks to finish. After that though, may be a good time to begin posts covering Shirata Sensei’s first Tandoku Dosa (Solo body movement exercises). I also will likely post a few exercises of my own creation that I find useful.

      All of these come with the usual admonition, while I do the best I can, one really, needs to have “hands on” to be certain one is doing the correct thing. This also helps to accelerate acquisition and proper development.

      Thank you again for you interest!,
      Allen

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s